The American Society of Landscape Architects Hawaii Chapter is developing a recommended list of potentially invasive plants to avoid using within the industry.
The ASLA Executive Committee has determined three basic approaches to best address the invasive plant issue:
· Develop a more proactive approach
· Use more caution in choosing plants
· Continue to use plants that have more benefit than risk
The committee reviewed only the plants on the
Weed Risk Assessments (WRA) list that are predicted to be invasive, focusing only on the benefits, since the WRA has determined the risk.
WRA is an ongoing process by the state Division of Forestry and Wildlife Kaulunani Urban Forestry Program, with a grant from the U.S. Forest Service, to list plant species that are predicted to be invasive.
An initial review of each plant was conducted by ASLA with six possible determinations:
1. Do Not Plant
2. Continue to Plant
3. Plant but refrain from using near sensitive environs
4. Obtain industry input and consensus
5. Do not plant if equal alternative is propagated
6. Request additional information
"We have ethics codes in our different industries, such as not introducing invasive species that might cause problems to the ecosystem," said Christopher Dacus, landscape architect with the state Department of Transportation, Highways Division Design Branch. "How do we at ASLA take this and provide questions of planting with more black-and-white answers: Should you use it? Should you not use it? Should you seek an alternative or should you use it only in certain locations? This can be seen as building on what Christy Martin and the Codes of Conduct have been doing, looking at about 20 plants," Dacus said. "But, this is looking at more than 150 plants, all the ones identified as potentially invasive by the WRA. We looked at the whole list as a survey. It's a way of building on the Codes of Conduct and getting more of the industry involved."